Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41816397›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026

Application of dual-energy computed tomography combined with radiomics in the clinical diagnosis of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jiaye Zhang, Jie Lin, Junna Wang, Yuanyu Liang, Chen Gao, Hao Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiaye Zhang *The First School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9841-540X
Jie Lin *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1157-073X
Junna WangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0940-2952
Yuanyu LiangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7861-2609
Chen GaoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9372-8014
Hao ZhengDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7715-7905

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally, with early precise diagnosis critical for improving prognosis. Conventional computed tomography (CT) lacks sufficient sensitivity for early malignant nodule detection, while pathological biopsy is invasive and limited by sampling bias-creating an urgent need for non-invasive, high-accuracy diagnostic tools. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) across different clinical scenarios of lung cancer and further explore the additional diagnostic value of its integration with radiomics models, aiming to provide an evidence-based reference for precise imaging assessment and clinical decision-making in lung cancer. Methods: We systematically searched relevant databases, screened eligible studies, applied quality assessment tools for comprehensive bias evaluation, and analyzed their diagnostic accuracy. Statistical analysis software was used to perform heterogeneity test and subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis, while Spearman rank correlation test was employed to examine the threshold effect. Results: A total of 2,899 lesions were included across the 21 studies [2016-2025]. Differentiating benign from malignant: DECT achieved a pooled sensitivity of 0.87 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83-0.91], a specificity of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.79-0.93), and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90-0.95). Integrated DECT-radiomics model showed training set a sensitivity of 0.90, a specificity of 0.88, an AUC of 0.94 (95% CIs: 0.85-0.93, 0.80-0.94, 0.85-1.00). Invasiveness prediction: DECT demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.83 (0.80-0.85), a specificity of 0.79 (0.76-0.83), and an AUC of 0.85 (0.81-0.88). DECT-radiomics integration improved performance, with training set a sensitivity of 0.84, a specificity of 0.84, and an AUC of 0.91 (95% CIs: 0.80-0.87, 0.79-0.87, 0.88-0.93). In addition, the diagnostic efficacy of DECT for predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) was evaluated independently: a sensitivity of 0.84 (0.75-0.90), a specificity of 0.83 (0.75-0.89), an AUC of 0.90 (0.87-0.93). Subgroup regression analysis indicated that feature extraction methods and radiomics algorithms are the most important sources of heterogeneity. This study did not find significant threshold effect or publication bias (P>0.05). Conclusions: DECT demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy in assessing key characteristics of lung cancer. When integrated with radiomics, it significantly improves the performance of distinguishing benign from malignant lesions and enhances the accuracy of invasiveness prediction, thereby offering robust technical support for optimizing precision imaging assessment strategies in lung cancer. In future research, the clinical generalizability and translational potential of this combined technique could be further validated through an expanded sample size and the inclusion of lung cancer cases representing diverse pathological subtypes.

Indexed as

diagnostic efficacyDual-energy computed tomography (DECT)lung cancerradiomics

Identifiers

PMID41816397
PMCPMC12972822

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.