Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41816410›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026

First-line therapies with maintenance regimens for driver gene-negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 61 randomized trials.

Ye Zhao, Hai-Ming Feng, Yu-Kan Chen, Jin-Hui Tian, Xiao-Jun Liu, Jing Wang, Xiao-Rui Pang, Shu-Ping Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ye Zhao *Department of Radiotherapy, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Gansu Provincial Clinical Medical Research Center for Chest Diseases, Lanzhou, China.
Hai-Ming Feng *Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Yu-Kan ChenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Gansu Provincial Clinical Medical Research Center for Chest Diseases, Lanzhou, China.
Jin-Hui TianEvidence-based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Xiao-Jun LiuDepartment of Radiotherapy, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Gansu Provincial Clinical Medical Research Center for Chest Diseases, Lanzhou, China.
Jing WangDepartment of Radiotherapy, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Gansu Provincial Clinical Medical Research Center for Chest Diseases, Lanzhou, China.
Xiao-Rui PangDepartment of Radiotherapy, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Gansu Provincial Clinical Medical Research Center for Chest Diseases, Lanzhou, China.
Shu-Ping LiDepartment of Radiotherapy, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Gansu Provincial Clinical Medical Research Center for Chest Diseases, Lanzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Does efficacy differ among first-line treatment strategies that include maintenance therapy (MT) in patients with advanced driver-gene wild-type non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)? Few studies have directly compared these MT-containing strategies, and the optimal regimen for this population remains uncertain. In this Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA), we aimed (I) to compare the efficacy and safety of available first-line regimens incorporating MT and to rate the certainty of evidence, and (II) to compare outcomes across chemotherapy (CT) backbones when combined with MT. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that randomized patients before first-line treatment initiation and included MT in at least one study arm. We assessed risk of bias for each RCT and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework to rate certainty of evidence. We performed a Bayesian NMA and compared MT-containing regimens across CT backbones using prespecified subgroup analyses. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021215862). Results: We included 61 RCTs. Certainty of evidence for primary outcomes was mostly moderate to low. Continuous dual immunotherapy [DI; anti-PD-(L)1 plus anti-CTLA-4] ranked highest for overall survival (OS) in the overall population. In patients with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) <1%, DI remained preferred because it was associated with improved OS, regardless of histology. In non-squamous (NSQ) NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥1%, pemetrexed-platinum plus single immunotherapy (SI), with maintenance pemetrexed plus anti-PD-(L)1, may be the most appropriate option. By contrast, in squamous (SQ) NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥1%, platinum-based CT plus SI, with maintenance anti-PD-(L)-1, may be optimal. Conclusions: Among all available first-line therapies incorporating MT for advanced driver-gene wild-type NSCLC, immunotherapies play a central role. DI was associated with an OS advantage over CT in patients with PD-L1 <1%. With increasing PD-L1 expression, chemo-immunotherapy [CT plus a single anti-PD-(L)1 antibody] was associated with durable clinical benefit. However, additional evidence is needed to compare continuous DI with other MT-containing strategies, particularly for progression-free survival in key subgroups.

Indexed as

First-line chemotherapy (first-line CT)immunotherapymaintenance therapy (MT)network meta-analysisnon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Identifiers

PMID41816410
PMCPMC12972812

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.