ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2026
Noninvasive biomarkers in thymic epithelial tumors: a systematic review of cfDNA/ctDNA detection, molecular profiling, and organoid-based monitoring.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors in thymic epithelial tumors: current evidence, immune-related toxicity, and perioperative considerations-a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Precision Oncology in Thymic Epithelial Tumors: Therapeutic Horizons and Implementation Barriers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs), including thymomas and thymic carcinomas, are rare malignancies with limited treatment options and no established biomarkers for surveillance. Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) provide a non-invasive method for understanding tumor biology, detecting minimal residual disease (MRD), and possibly identifying recurrence. While this approach has added to the management of other solid tumors, its role in TETs remains poorly defined. The objective of this review was to evaluate the feasibility, molecular insights, and clinical utility of cfDNA and ctDNA for diagnosis, molecular profiling, and recurrence monitoring in TETs. Methods: This systematic review summarizes the current evidence on cfDNA and ctDNA in TETs. Studies were identifies through systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting abstracts from inception through July 2025. Eligible studies reported cfDNA or ctDNA analysis in patients with histologically confirmed thymoma or thymic carcinoma, and excluded reviews, commentaries, abstracts without full text, and non-blood based liquid biopsy studies. Data extraction included patient characteristics, assay platforms, mutational findings, and clinical applications. Data were synthesized narratively due to methodological heterogeneity. No formal risk of bias assessment was performed because of the small number of included studies. Results: Six studies involving 289 patients met inclusion criteria. ctDNA detection was feasible across all studies, with detection rates ranging from 46% to 80%. Recurrent alterations included Conclusions: Liquid biopsy approaches based on cfDNA and ctDNA have shown applicability in TETs and provide clinically relevant molecular information in settings where tissue-based analysis is limited. Tumor informed ctDNA strategies show particular promise for postoperative monitoring and longitudinal disease assessment, whereas broader clinical adoption remains investigational. Further prospective, multicenter studies are needed to establish standardized workflows and clarify the role of liquid biopsy across diagnostic, therapeutic, and surveillance contexts in TETs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.