ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2026
Construction of taurine metabolism-related risk model and subtype identification in colorectal cancer to predict prognosis and immunological features.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents a significant global health burden. Despite advances in treatment, survival rates remain low for patients diagnosed at advanced stages. Although taurine plays an indispensable role in cancer development and progression, its specific relationship with CRC prognosis has not been fully explored. Therefore, this study aims to construct a prognostic model based on taurine metabolism-related genes (TMRGs) to evaluate its potential value in CRC risk stratification, tumor microenvironment remodeling, and the development of personalized treatment strategies. Methods: This study integrated multi-omics data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases to systematically screen differentially expressed TMRGs (DETMRGs). Using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and multivariate Cox analysis, we constructed a prognostic model and established a risk stratification framework. Molecular subtyping was performed based on these signature genes, followed by a comprehensive evaluation of the immune microenvironment (CIBERSORT/ESTIMATE), tumor mutational burden, drug sensitivity (pRRophetic/CellMiner), and immunotherapy response [immunophenoscore (IPS)/IMvigor210 cohort] to thoroughly validate the clinical predictive utility of the model. Results: This study identified 175 DETMRGs and constructed a prognostic model comprising 9 key genes. The model demonstrated robust survival predictive capability in both training and independent validation cohorts [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) >0.74], effectively stratifying patients into molecular subtypes with significant survival disparities. In-depth analyses revealed that the high-risk group was enriched in pro-oncogenic signaling pathways (e.g., WNT, RTK-Ras) and exhibited an immunosuppressive microenvironment (elevated Treg infiltration, reduced immune scores) with inferior response to programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy. Conversely, the low-risk group activated immune-related pathways (e.g., JAK-STAT) and showed heightened sensitivity to chemotherapy agents such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Conclusions: The taurine metabolism-related risk model developed in this study reliably predicts the prognosis of CRC patients and their response to immunotherapy, thereby enabling personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.