ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2026
Identification of mitochondrial-related subtypes and development of a prognostic model for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive malignancy characterized by a poor prognosis. Mitochondrial dysfunction, including alterations in metabolism, dynamics, and DNA, is increasingly recognized as a critical factor in the initiation and progression of pancreatic cancer. This study aimed to systematically investigate the role of mitochondrial dysfunction in PDAC to identify mitochondria-related genes (MitoRGs) of prognostic significance, explore associated molecular subtypes, and examine their effects on the tumor immune microenvironment. Methods: We integrated transcriptomic data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases to identify a set of MitoRGs with significant prognostic value for PDAC. Their expression was further validated in PDAC cells and using single-cell RNA-sequencing data. Unsupervised clustering was employed to classify PDAC patients into distinct subtypes based on MitoRG expression patterns. A robust prognostic model was subsequently constructed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-Cox regression analysis. The predictive accuracy of the model for 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) was assessed. The immune cell infiltration and genomic features of the risk groups defined by the model were also analyzed. Finally, a clinically applicable nomogram was developed to facilitate prognostic prediction. Results: Based on MitoRG expression, PDAC patients were classified into two distinct subtypes (clusters A and B). Patients in cluster A exhibited significantly better OS than those in cluster B. A prognostic model based on a seven-MitoRG signature was established, which demonstrated high predictive accuracy. The high-risk group, as defined by the model, was characterized by an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, featuring reduced cytotoxic T-cell activity and increased stromal components. This group also showed significant enrichment of driver mutations such as Conclusions: This study established a significant link between mitochondrial dysfunction and PDAC molecular subtypes, immune microenvironment remodeling, and clinical prognosis. The developed seven-MitoRG signature and nomogram could serve as reliable prognostic tools. These findings provide insights into the role of mitochondria in the pathogenesis of PDAC and offer potential targets for developing personalized therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.