ArticleCase reports in obstetrics and gynecology2026
Combined Management of a Rare Case of an Incarcerated Intrauterine Device: Case Report and Review of the Literature.
Article in Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Small bowel necrosis caused by migrated intrauterine device: a rare surgical emergency.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Combined Management of a Rare Case of an Incarcerated Intrauterine Device: Case Report and Review of the Literature.Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hormonal intrauterine systems are widely used for long-acting reversible contraception and for managing gynecological conditions such as heavy menstrual bleeding and endometrial hyperplasia. Although rare, complications such as uterine embedment and perforation can occur, potentially leading to device malfunction or injury displacement. This is the first reported case describing the removal of a fully incarcerated hormonal intrauterine system using a combined hysteroscopic and laparoscopic approach. Our findings suggest that this technique may offer a safe and effective alternative for managing cases of embedded intrauterine devices where conventional hysteroscopic removal is unsuccessful. Case Presentation: We report the case of a 35-year-old asymptomatic woman with a hormonal intrauterine system fully embedded in the posterior myometrial wall, positioned 4.3 mm from the uterine serosa. The device was initially confirmed to be intracavitary upon insertion but was later found to have migrated into the myometrium during a routine 30-day follow-up ultrasound. Initial attempts at hysteroscopic removal failed due to poor visualization and a broken retrieval string. Given the high risk of iatrogenic injury, a combined laparoscopic-hysteroscopic approach was planned. Under laparoscopic visualization and transrectal ultrasound guidance, a careful myometrial excision using a hysteroscopic-angled loop was performed, successfully freeing and removing the intrauterine device. A bilateral salpingectomy was also conducted at the patient's request. Conclusion: A combined laparoscopic-hysteroscopic approach under ultrasound guidance may be regarded as a viable technique for complex cases of intrauterine device incarceration within the myometrium, minimizing the risk of uterine perforation and adjacent organ injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.