ArticleFrontiers in genetics2026
m6AHD: a new framework for identifying abnormal N6-methyladenosine (m6A) in heart diseases based on sequencing features.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major threat to health, with high incidence rates and a trend toward younger age groups. RNA modifications are an important component of epigenetics, widely present and indispensable in cells. Increasing evidence suggests that RNA modifications are key regulatory factors involved in cardiac physiological and pathological changes. Understanding the role of RNA modifications in heart-related diseases can help us to identify new drug targets. Methods: To systematically investigate the role of m6A modification in different cardiac diseases, we integrated m6A epitranscriptome profiles from five cardiac pathological conditions (three drug-induced cardiac toxicity models-Evodiamine, Matrine, and TKI, hypertrophy, and heart calcification) and their control groups to construct the first predictive model for abnormal m6A modification in cardiac diseases. We constructed separate models for upregulated and downregulated modifications under different pathological conditions, performed feature selection and parameter optimization, and validated the performance of our models using an independent test set. Results: m6AHD demonstrated excellent performance on the independent test set, with AUROC scores ranging from 0.728 to 0.880 across various pathological conditions. Cross-validation across different conditions and model interpretability demonstrated that m6A modifications exhibit similar patterns under different pathological conditions and are potentially regulated by similar factors, providing new clues for identifying targets in cardiovascular diseases at the epitranscriptome level. Furthermore, we validated our findings using a zebrafish model of Evodiamine-induced cardiotoxicity. The experimental results revealed significant morphological defects and a broad downregulation of m6A methyltransferase complex components, confirming the involvement of aberrant m6A machinery in the pathology of cardiotoxicity. Discussion: m6AHD is the first dedicated framework for predicting multi-condition cardiac m6A dysregulation. Our findings underscore the critical role of m6A homeostasis in cardiomyocyte function and demonstrate that aberrant methylation patterns can serve as reliable indicators of cardiac pathology. This framework provides a robust computational tool for identifying potential therapeutic targets at the epitranscriptome level for cardiovascular diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.