ArticleJournal of viral hepatitis2026
Delivering Effective Hepatitis C Virus Treatment in an Embedded Primary Care Setting Within a Tertiary Care Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan.
Article in Journal of viral hepatitis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) endemic regions require accessible treatment interventions. Effectiveness and costs of a pilot HCV treatment programme were evaluated at an embedded primary care service within a tertiary care centre at Indus Hospital and Health Network in Karachi, Pakistan. Data on patients (n = 1288, median age 40 years) initiating direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment (October 2016 to December 2018) were extracted from hospital records. Eligible patients had chronic HCV, were treatment naïve, and without hepatic decompensation. Multivariable logistic regression analysed factors associated with treatment outcomes (not completing treatment, treatment completion without sustained virological response test at 12 weeks (SVR12) visit, and treatment completion with SVR12). Costs (2019 USD) were estimated using micro-costing from financial records and staff interviews. Among 1288 patients (63% women), 93% (1200/1288) completed treatment, and 74% (884/1200) attended SVR12 visit, with 98% (n = 870/884) cured. Compared with 0-29 year-olds, incomplete treatment was lower among 30-49 year-olds (aOR 0.47 [0.26-0.83]) and ≥ 50 year-olds (aOR 0.48 [0.24-0.93]). SVR12 non-attendance was higher for 24-week versus 12-week regimens (aOR: 3.46 [1.51-7.93]), but lower for patients with APRI scores 0.5-1.49 (aOR 0.69 [0.50-0.96]) and ≥ 1.5 (aOR 0.44 [0.24-0.78]) compared to 0-0.49. The mean treatment cost was $370.74 per patient, driven by clinic visits $271.80 (73.3%), labs $68.32 (18.4%), and DAAs $30.62 (8.3%). Overall, a high treatment completion and cure rate were achieved, with a low average cost per patient, indicating that this HCV treatment model can be affordable and may be considered for widescale treatment scale-up in Pakistan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.