ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
Multicohort Validation of Gut Microbiome Signatures for Cholangiocarcinoma Diagnosis and Functional Characterization of Bifidobacterium Pseudocatenulatum.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Growing evidence suggests a role for the gut microbiome in progression of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), however, its diagnostic and therapeutic potential remains incompletely characterized. Here, metagenomic sequencing was performed on fecal samples (n = 785) from individuals across East, Central, and Northwestern China. Gut microbial dysbiosis in CCA was characterized by depletion of short-chain fatty acids-producing species and enrichment of potential pathobionts (Klebsiella aerogenes, Clostridium symbiosum). Diagnostic models built using species-level markers demonstrated superior performance, compared to pathway-based models, achieving area under the curve (AUC) values of 98.63% and 99.42% in the discovery cohort, with robust cross-regional validation (AUC = 80.89% and 80.43%). The model effectively distinguished CCA from hepatocellular carcinoma (AUC = 97.86%) and liver fibrosis (AUC = 98.73%) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (mean AUC = 96.86%). Analysis of public datasets encompassing 6847 samples across 31 studies and 11 disease states revealed moderate disease specificity influenced by biomarker overlap across conditions. Mechanistically, depleted Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum suppressed CCA progression, associated with inhibition of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway. Collectively, this study supports the potential of fecal metagenomic signatures as a complementary noninvasive aid for CCA detection, and provides functional evidence for a candidate protective microbe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.