Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41817421›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Precision cutaneous stimulation in freely moving mice.

Isobel Parkes, Ara Schorscher-Petcu, Qinyi Gan, Liam E Browne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Isobel ParkesWolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6569-618X
Ara Schorscher-PetcuWolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5808-5172
Qinyi GanWolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3962-5501
Liam E BrowneWolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5693-7703

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N013867/1Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society 10.35802/109372
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatosensation connects animals to their immediate environment, shaping critical behaviors essential for adaptation, learning, and survival. Probing the relationships between somatosensory inputs and behavior in mice presents substantial challenges, primarily due to the practical difficulties of delivering stimuli to the skin during movement. To address this problem, we have developed a system for precise cutaneous stimulation of mice as they walk and run through environments. The system employs real-time body part tracking and targeted optical stimuli, offering precision while preserving the naturalistic context of the behaviors studied, thereby overcoming the traditional trade-offs between precision and animal behavior. We demonstrate the system from nociceptive testing conducted in standard small chambers to behavior in large complex environments, such as mazes. We observed that cutaneous inputs evoke rapid responses, which modify behavior when stimuli are applied during motion. This system provides a means to explore the diverse and integrative nature of somatosensation, from reflexes to decision-making, in naturalistic settings.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalPhysical StimulationSkinAnimalsMiceNociceptionOptogeneticsbehaviorclosed-loopmouseneurosciencenociceptionoptogeneticspainsomatosensation

Identifiers

PMID41817421
PMCPMC12981839

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.