ReviewTropical animal health and production2026
Harnessing the dietary potential of cassava leaf and peel meals as novel feed resources in broiler nutrition.
Review in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance thresholds, processing requirements, and circular bioeconomy potential of agro-industrial by-products in African broiler nutrition: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Poultry science · 2026Review
- Feeding strategies with fresh cassava root to improve dairy cow productivity in the tropics.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Energy and protein are important in chicken diets, with maize and soybeans traditionally serving as primary sources. Rising costs of maize and soybean meal have necessitated the search for sustainable alternatives, such as abundant cassava peel meal (CPM) and cassava leaf meal (CLM). CPM is rich in carbohydrates, minerals, and fibre, while CLM has high levels of amino acids, vitamins, and carotenoids. Both are deficient in sulphur-amino acids (cysteine and methionine) but rich in lysine, an amino acid often lacking in cereal grains. Low inclusion levels (≤ 12.5% CPM or ≤ 5% CLM) improve broiler growth performance compared to conventional diets without negative effects on carcass yield, meat quality, organ weights, or blood parameters, while lowering feed costs and increasing gross margins. In contrast, higher inclusion levels (> 20% CPM or > 15% CLM) impair growth and blood indices, due to high fibre content, residual hydrogen cyanide (HCN), and other antinutritional factors (ANFs) like condensed tannins and phytates. Enzyme supplementation alleviates these adverse impacts and enhances nutrient utilisation, though outcomes vary with processing method, plant part used, diet composition, and inclusion rate. The practical implication of these findings is that diets containing cassava by-products require careful formulation, especially to balance the limiting sulphur-containing amino acids. Future research should optimise processing techniques and enzyme combinations to support higher inclusion levels and maximising the potential of these abundant resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.