Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41817887›Full record

ReviewActa parasitologica2026

Phytoextracts Used in the Treatment of Cryptosporidiosis and Giardiasis: Current State.

Ardra Panavoor Namboodiri, Shahira Abdelaziz Ali Ahmed, Panagiotis Karanis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta parasitologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ardra Panavoor NamboodiriDepartment of Biomedicine and Medical Diagnostics, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland Central, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
Shahira Abdelaziz Ali AhmedDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, 41522, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0310-8725
Panagiotis KaranisFaculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany. karanis.p@unic.ac.cy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytoextracts are safer, more affordable, and more readily available than conventional medications, making them promising anti-parasitic treatment options. Cryptosporidium species (spp.) and Giardia duodenalis are protozoan parasites responsible for cryptosporidiosis and giardiasis, respectively, primarily affecting immunocompromised individuals, children, and populations in developing countries. Although treatment options exist, many of them have significant side effects. The current review aims to evaluate the efficacy of phytoextracts tested against Cryptosporidium spp. and G. duodenalis infections. The current review indicated that the Asteraceae and Rutaceae families were the most extensively investigated sources of phytoextracts. Additionally, Zingiber officinale is the only extract to demonstrate efficacy against both parasites in in vivo studies. Furthermore, Curcuma longa and Morinda royoc showed the highest in vitro efficacy against Cryptosporidium spp. and G. duodenalis, respectively. These results underscore the potential of phytoextracts as alternative therapeutic modalities for the treatment of cryptosporidiosis and giardiasis.

Indexed as

Antiprotozoal AgentsCryptosporidiosisCryptosporidiumGiardia lambliaGiardiasisPlant ExtractsAnimalsHumansAntiprotozoal AgentsPlant ExtractsCryptosporidium speciesGiardia duodenalisIn vitroIn vivoMedicinal plantsPhytoextracts

Identifiers

PMID41817887
PMCPMC12982287

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.