ArticlePloS one2026
Deep-Fed: A comprehensive solution for precise bone fracture identification in athletes.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in detecting foot and ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone fracture diagnosis is a critical aspect of sports medicine, where accurate and timely detection enables effective treatment and rapid recovery. This study proposes Deep-Fed, a federated deep learning framework for fracture diagnosis in athletes. Deep-Fed integrates convolutional neural networks with a specialized classification module, FractureNet, and trains it across distributed athletic clinics using federated averaging without exchanging raw images, thereby preserving patient privacy while leveraging diverse data sources. The framework was evaluated on three benchmark datasets-Deep-I, Deep-II, and Deep-III-representing varied imaging conditions and patient groups. Deep-Fed achieved accuracy rates of 96.23 ± 0.42%, 97.11 ± 0.35%, and 96.73 ± 0.39%, respectively, significantly outperforming Baseline 1 (87.23 ± 0.68%), Baseline 2 (90.15 ± 0.55%), and Baseline 3 (94.49 ± 0.47%). Statistical analysis using paired t-tests confirmed that Deep-Fed's improvements were significant (p < 0.05) across all comparisons. These results demonstrate that federated learning can be effectively applied for high-accuracy fracture detection in decentralized clinical settings, enabling collaboration across institutions without compromising data privacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.