ReviewJournal of medical Internet research2026
Use of Health and Welfare Technology in Palliative Care: State-of-the-Art Review.
Review in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of Health and Welfare Technology in Palliative Care: State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Review
- Patient Experiences and Information Needs in Palliative Care: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.Indian journal of palliative careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs more individuals live longer with complex conditions, the need for effective palliative care (PC) grows. It has been stated that access to PC should be integrated early and delivered in a timely manner to patients with life-threatening illnesses. Health and welfare technologies (HWTs) offer tools to enhance care delivery, particularly in home and rural settings. Although there is a profound lack of evidence regarding the impact when used in PC, it is necessary to critically assess the current state of knowledge regarding impacts and consequences of technologies, ensuring that their integration considers broader implications for patients, caregivers, and health care systems in PC.
objectiveThis review explores health and welfare technology used in PC, aiming to inform practice and improve care quality.
methodsThis state-of-the-art review included empirical studies describing the use of HWT in PC for adult patients. We used a thematic synthesis approach to compare studies and provide a synthesis of the key points.
resultsBased on the inclusion criteria, 94 studies were included. PC is both a clinical specialty and an overall approach to care that focuses on improving quality of life and relieving suffering for patients and families facing serious illness, based on needs and not prognosis. HWT shows potential to increase access and continuity of care, for symptom management to support patients to remain at home and prevent frequent emergency visits. It can have the potential to build and remain relationships between patients, their families, and the health care team, as well as for interprofessional collaboration and support. However, there are challenges to overcome that might affect the quality of care when using technology.
conclusionsHWT shows potential as a complement to usual PC. Our findings point toward the importance of caution in choosing when to use HWT in PC, and for which patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.