Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41819266›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2026

NIH-FDA Nutrition Regulatory Science Workshop: advancing research and policy.

Andrew A Bremer, Samantha Adas, Alison Gm Brown, Kellie O Casavale, Steven Hermansky, Kirsten Herrick, Claudine J Kavanaugh, Holly L Nicastro, Sheri D Schully, Jill Reedy and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Andrew A BremerOffice of Nutrition Research, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. Electronic address: andrew.bremer@nih.gov.
Samantha AdasOffice of Nutrition Research, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Alison Gm BrownNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Kellie O CasavaleHuman Foods Program, FDA, 5001 Campus Drive, College Park, Maryland 20740, USA.
Steven HermanskyHuman Foods Program, FDA, 5001 Campus Drive, College Park, Maryland 20740, USA.
Kirsten HerrickNational Cancer Institute, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Claudine J KavanaughHuman Foods Program, FDA, 5001 Campus Drive, College Park, Maryland 20740, USA.
Holly L NicastroOffice of Nutrition Research, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Sheri D SchullyAll of Us Research Program, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Jill ReedyNational Cancer Institute, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Ashley J VargasNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Krista A ZanettiEnvironmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Robin A McKinnonHuman Foods Program, FDA, 5001 Campus Drive, College Park, Maryland 20740, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNutrition plays a pivotal role in health, yet poor dietary habits are now the leading risk factor for illness and death. In the United States, diet-related conditions such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and obesity cause >1 million deaths per year and are leading contributors to the nation's $4.5 trillion in healthcare spending.

objectivesAddressing these issues requires coordinated efforts across multiple sectors and government agencies. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are essential partners in this endeavor. A strong foundation of scientific research, coupled with effective, practical, and real-world regulatory activities, is critical to inform consumers and support a healthier food environment.

methodsIn December 2024, NIH and FDA convened a workshop to advance nutrition science for food-related policy decision making. A diverse group of researchers, policymakers, and other experts participated in the event to identify research gaps, explore strategies for enhanced NIH-FDA collaboration, and highlight emerging technologies in nutrition science, with a particular focus on the topic of ultra-processed foods.

resultsThe workshop was designed to do the following: 1) identify critical research gaps and priorities in nutrition regulatory science; 2) enhance scientific collaboration between NIH and FDA; 3) explore how scientific evidence informs food-related policies and regulations; and 4) highlight emerging technologies and data resource needs for nutrition research.

conclusionThis article summarizes the workshop proceedings and describes priority research gaps, opportunities, and suggested next steps that emerged from the discussions.

Indexed as

Nutritional SciencesNutrition PolicyUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationHumansNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)United Statesdietary habitsfood environmentfood regulationhealthnutrition

Identifiers

PMID41819266
PMCPMC13197915

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.