ArticleBMJ open2026
Determinants of untimely receipt and non-receipt of routine childhood immunisation in Ebonyi state based on the Adapted Omale INDEPT FORCIS Framework and recommendations for policy and practice: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe significant morbidity and mortalities from, and the recurrent outbreaks of, the vaccine-preventable infectious diseases (VPDs) of childhood could be due not only to non-receipt of recommended vaccinations but also to untimely receipt, which impairs the validity of immunisation coverage and protection against VPDs. This study explored the determinants of untimely receipt and non-receipt of routine childhood immunisation and made recommendations for policy and practice.
designThis qualitative study was based on the Adapted Omale INDEPT FORCIS Framework - Determinants of Routine Childhood Vaccination Receipt Conceptual Framework. STUDY SETTING AND
participantsFrom 22 August 2022 to 9 September 2022, 15 semi-structured, face-to-face focus group discussions were conducted in English, pidgin English and the local language with 127 purposively selected consenting parents of infants aged 0-2 months (with other key community members) and primary healthcare workers involved in the provision of routine childhood immunisation in Ebonyi state, Nigeria. ANALYSIS: Data analysis involved deductive (and some inductive) thematic analysis.
resultsThere were many underlying determinants of untimely receipt and non-receipt of routine childhood immunisation, which included individual-related factors (mothers' unfavourable experiences and perceptions and lack of knowledge about childhood diseases, vaccines/vaccinations and the vaccination system, relocation/travel from place of residence, children and/or mothers being ill); childhood disease-related, vaccination-related and the vaccination system-related factors (diseases not always severe/fatal, vaccinations causing side-effects, vaccination system constraints in availability, accessibility, affordability and acceptability); family and other individual-related factors; and broader context-related sociopolitical, cultural, economic, infrastructural, historic and health system factors.
conclusionThe evidence demonstrates many specific and fundamental complex and interrelated determinants of untimely receipt and non-receipt of routine childhood immunisation and emphasises the need for multifaceted and innovative actions in dealing with the determinants in the drive to address the high morbidity and mortalities and recurring outbreaks of VPDs in Ebonyi state, Nigeria, and similar settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.