Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41820406›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Cross-cancer survival prediction using machine learning models.

Lucas Buk Cardoso, Jones Eduardo Egydio, Tatiana Natasha Toporcov, Nanci Yumi Utida, Maria Paula Curado, Gisele Aparecida Fernandes, Adeylson Guimarães Ribeiro, Bryan Gilvaz Chin, Vanderlei Cunha Parro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lucas Buk CardosoCenter for Embeded Eletronic Systems, Instituto Mauá de Tecnologia, São Caetano do Sul, 09580-900, Brazil. lucas.cardoso@maua.br.
Jones Eduardo EgydioCenter for Embeded Eletronic Systems, Instituto Mauá de Tecnologia, São Caetano do Sul, 09580-900, Brazil.
Tatiana Natasha ToporcovEpidemiology Department, Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 01246-904, Brazil.
Nanci Yumi UtidaEpidemiology Department, Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 01246-904, Brazil.
Maria Paula CuradoEpidemiology and Statistics on Cancer Group, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, 01525-001, Brazil.
Gisele Aparecida FernandesEpidemiology and Statistics on Cancer Group, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, 01525-001, Brazil.
Adeylson Guimarães RibeiroInformation and Epidemiology, Fundação Oncocentro de São Paulo, São Paulo, 05409-012, Brazil.
Bryan Gilvaz ChinCenter for Embeded Eletronic Systems, Instituto Mauá de Tecnologia, São Caetano do Sul, 09580-900, Brazil.
Vanderlei Cunha ParroCenter for Embeded Eletronic Systems, Instituto Mauá de Tecnologia, São Caetano do Sul, 09580-900, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the many challenges faced by healthcare systems, cancer remains one of the most urgent. This makes the application of artificial intelligence a critical tool for enhancing early detection and optimizing treatment strategies, especially given the growing volume of patient data being collected. In this study, machine learning models trained on data for a specific type of cancer were employed to predict three-year survival after diagnosis for other cancer types. Two groups were considered: the most frequent cancers and those related to the digestive system. The data were extracted from the Hospital Based Cancer Registries of São Paulo, covering 2000 to 2019, with a consistent selection protocol across all cancer types to enable cross-prediction. XGBoost and LightGBM algorithms were used, choosing the best-performing model for predictions across different topographies. Using a combined dataset of oral cavity, esophageal, and stomach cancers, the model achieved a balanced accuracy of 80.18%, compared with 79.92% for the stomach-specific model. Statistical testing showed no significant difference between these values, suggesting comparable predictive performance. These results illustrate the potential of cross-prediction, especially for rare cancer types where data scarcity represents a significant challenge.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeoplasmsBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsHumansPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPrognosisSurvival AnalysisCancerCross-predictionMachine learningSurvival predictionXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID41820406
PMCPMC13009373

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.