ArticleScientific reports2026
Hybrid knowledge- and data-driven modelling for robust spike detection and sorting in human C-fiber microneurography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Analyzing temporal spike patterns in C-fibers recorded via microneurography is challenging due to the use of a single recording electrode, waveform variability, and high similarity of spike shapes across neurons, limiting the interpretation of sensory coding, such as pain and itch. We present a computational pipeline combining peak detection and supervised classification for spike sorting to improve the analysis of discharges, identified through activity-dependent conduction velocity changes. In the knowledge-driven step, we extract spike templates from electrically evoked spikes obtained during low-frequency stimulation and focus on the “best” template as the fiber of interest. Spike detection is further restricted to intervals showing activity-dependent latency shifts, substantially reducing the search space compared to unsupervised clustering. In the data-driven steps, we systematically evaluate three feature sets and machine learning models: One-class SVM, SVM, and XGBoost. For the evaluation, we created a specialized stimulation protocol, providing reliable ground truth labels for all electrically evoked spikes, allowing precise spike time-locking. Compared to Spike2 software, our approach achieved higher F1-scores and reduced false positives, indicating improved spike sorting. Although XGBoost achieved the highest median F1-scores, optimal performance was dependent on individual combinations of feature sets and models for each recording. In some recordings with many nerve fibers and a low signal-to-noise ratio, reliable sorting was not feasible. This highlights the necessity to determine sortability and optimal configurations for individual recordings. To illustrate the potential of our approach to sensory spike train analysis, we present a proof-of-concept application of the pipeline to chemically induced C-fiber activity. These findings represent an important step toward reliable analysis of activity associated with pain and itch signaling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.