ArticlePhotosynthesis research2026
Effects of different light intensities on photosynthetic properties of endangered Primula filchnerae seedlings.
Article in Photosynthesis research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As a rare and endangered species, Primula filchnerae Knuth faces high seedling-stage mortality that likely contributes significantly to its threatened status. The study aims to investigate the effects of different light intensities under controlled conditions on the photosynthetic traits of P. filchnerae seedlings, elucidate its mechanism of light response and identify optimal light environments for seedlings survival, thereby providing a basis for scientific protection. The three light-intensity treatments were established through artificial shading to simulate the constant light intensity of natural habitat conditions observed in the field: intermediate light intensity (L1, 162 µmol·m⁻²·s⁻¹, control), semi-open area (L2, 324 µmol·m⁻²·s⁻¹) and understory (L3, 5.4 µmol·m⁻²·s⁻¹). Our study revealed that P. filchnerae seedlings exhibited significantly reduced Pnmax and PIABS under both L2 and L3 treatments relative to L1. Specifically, the decrease in photosynthetic rate under L2 was caused by stomatal limitation, while that under L3 was induced by non-stomatal limitation. In contrast, P. filchnerae seedlings maintained high antioxidant enzyme activity and stable accumulation of osmoregulatory substances in L1 treatment. Transcriptomic profiling indicated that flavonoid biosynthesis pathway genes were highly expressed under L2 compared to L1, while photosynthesis-related genes were downregulated under L3 condition. Based on the findings, the L1 treatment represents the optimal growth condition for P. filchnerae seedlings, where photosynthetic efficiency, light energy utilization capacity and stress resistance achieve their most favorable synergistic state. In contrast, both the L2 and L3 conditions were shown to be suboptimal, adversely affecting seedlings growth and physiological performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41820608What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.