Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41820645›Full record

ArticleCommunications psychology2026

Alpha power increases spontaneously during a neurofeedback session.

Jacob Maaz, Laurent Waroquier, Alexandra Dia, Véronique Paban, Arnaud Rey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jacob MaazAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRPN, Marseille, France. jacob.maaz@univ-amu.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9566-1449
Laurent WaroquierAix Marseille Univ, PSYCLE, Aix-en-Provence, France.
Alexandra DiaAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRPN, Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-3526-2316
Véronique PabanAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRPN, Marseille, France.
Arnaud ReyAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRPN, Marseille, France.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency) ANR-16-CONV-0002Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency) HEBBIAN ANR-23-CE28-0008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electroencephalographic neurofeedback (EEG-NF) has been proposed as a promising technique to modulate brain activity through real-time EEG-based feedback. Alpha neurofeedback in particular is believed to induce rapid self-regulation of brain rhythms, with applications in cognitive enhancement and clinical treatment. However, whether this modulation reflects specific volitional control or non-specific influences remains unresolved. In a preregistered, double-blind, sham-controlled study, we evaluated alpha upregulation in healthy participants receiving either genuine (n = 30) or sham (n = 30) EEG-NF during a single-session design. A third arm composed of a passive control group (n = 32) was also included to differentiate between non-specific influences related or not to the active engagement in EEG-NF. Throughout the session, alpha power increased robustly, yet independently of feedback veracity, engagement in self-regulation, or feedback update frequency. Parallel increases in theta and sensorimotor rhythms further suggest broadband non-specific modulation. Importantly, these results challenge the foundational assumption of EEG-NF: that feedback enables volitional EEG control. Instead, they point to spontaneous repetition-related processes as primary drivers, calling for a critical reassessment of neurofeedback efficacy and its underlying mechanisms.

Identifiers

PMID41820645
PMCPMC13125214

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.