Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41820675›Full record

Trial reportNature medicine2026

A cognitive layer architecture to support large-language model performance in psychotherapy interactions.

Max Rollwage, Jessica McFadyen, Keno Juchems, Annamaria Balogh, Sashank Pisupati, Margareta-Theodora Mircea, Tobias U Hauser, George Prichard, Ross Harper

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Max Rollwage *Limbic, London, UK. rollwagm@gmail.com.
Jessica McFadyen *Limbic, London, UK.
Keno JuchemsLimbic, London, UK.
Annamaria BaloghLimbic, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9308-5407
Sashank PisupatiLimbic, London, UK.
Margareta-Theodora MirceaLimbic, London, UK.
Tobias U HauserLimbic, London, UK.
George PrichardLimbic, London, UK.
Ross HarperLimbic, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2403-2088

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinician-patient conversations form the cornerstone of mental healthcare. Large language models (LLMs) could hold promise for this domain but their effectiveness in patient-facing interactions remains largely unproven. Here we introduce a cognitive layer architecture that enhances general-purpose LLMs with specialized clinical psychotherapeutic reasoning capabilities. In a randomized, double-blind evaluation, 227 human participants generated naturalistic mental well-being session transcripts by interacting with different therapy agents. A consortium of 22 expert clinicians assessed these transcripts, finding that LLMs augmented with this architecture consistently outperformed both standalone state-of-the-art LLMs and human clinicians across key clinical competencies required for delivering high-quality cognitive-behavioral therapy. We validated these results in an analysis of 19,674 transcripts from a large-scale, real-world deployment where an LLM embedded within this cognitive layer architecture was used as part of healthcare delivery to support 8,920 users seeking mental well-being assistance. Increased cognitive layer activation was associated with greater symptom improvement and a higher likelihood of long-term clinical recovery (~10 weeks). Our findings demonstrate that a cognitive layer architecture can enable LLMs to deliver high-quality cognitive-behavioral therapy interactions, with continued research warranted into mechanisms and clinical efficacy of AI-assisted therapeutics.

Indexed as

CognitionCognitive Behavioral TherapyLarge Language ModelsPsychotherapyAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.