Trial reportNature medicine2026
A cognitive layer architecture to support large-language model performance in psychotherapy interactions.
Trial report in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world use and evaluation of a generative AI chatbot for Parkinson's disease information: a prospective observational study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
- Psychological Therapy in the Age of Large Language Models: Framework for Therapist-Delivered and AI-Supported Functions.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- Large Language Models as a New Tool for Therapists in Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Blinded Clinician Rating Pilot Experiment.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: A Narrative Review of Recent Clinical Applications and Ethical Considerations.Current psychiatry reports · 2026Review
- Current themes of AI in mental health: Actionable evidence and guardrails for mood and anxiety care.Journal of mood and anxiety disorders · 2026Review
- The interactive turn in generative AI for self-harm.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- From symptoms to function: the PAD-S decision matrix for severe mental illness-a transdiagnostic clinical translation framework for ICD-11/ICF-aligned psychotherapy documentation.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- AI-driven mental health decision support linked to clinician resilience and preparedness.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinician-patient conversations form the cornerstone of mental healthcare. Large language models (LLMs) could hold promise for this domain but their effectiveness in patient-facing interactions remains largely unproven. Here we introduce a cognitive layer architecture that enhances general-purpose LLMs with specialized clinical psychotherapeutic reasoning capabilities. In a randomized, double-blind evaluation, 227 human participants generated naturalistic mental well-being session transcripts by interacting with different therapy agents. A consortium of 22 expert clinicians assessed these transcripts, finding that LLMs augmented with this architecture consistently outperformed both standalone state-of-the-art LLMs and human clinicians across key clinical competencies required for delivering high-quality cognitive-behavioral therapy. We validated these results in an analysis of 19,674 transcripts from a large-scale, real-world deployment where an LLM embedded within this cognitive layer architecture was used as part of healthcare delivery to support 8,920 users seeking mental well-being assistance. Increased cognitive layer activation was associated with greater symptom improvement and a higher likelihood of long-term clinical recovery (~10 weeks). Our findings demonstrate that a cognitive layer architecture can enable LLMs to deliver high-quality cognitive-behavioral therapy interactions, with continued research warranted into mechanisms and clinical efficacy of AI-assisted therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41820675What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.