ArticleCell communication and signaling : CCS2026
STING-ERO1 signaling exacerbates PARylation-mediated parthanatos in sepsis.
Article in Cell communication and signaling : CCS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSepsis is a life-threatening condition characterized by uncontrolled inflammation, oxidative stress, and aberrant cell death. Although the STING pathway is well established as a central mediator of innate immunity, its functions beyond interferon signaling remain largely undefined. Here, we investigated a noncanonical STING–ERO1–PARP1 axis that drives oxidative damage and Parthanatos during sepsis.
methodsA combination of in vivo and in vitro approaches was employed to dissect the STING–ERO1–PARP1 signaling cascade. A sepsis model was established via cecal ligation and puncture, and various genetic knockout mice (STING⁻/⁻, cGAS⁻/⁻, and IFNAR1⁻/⁻) were used to assess pathway specificity. In vitro studies in RAW264.7 and iBMDM cells involved STING agonist stimulation combined with genetic knockouts (STING⁻/⁻, TBK1⁻/⁻), targeted inhibitors (PJ34, EN460, NAC), and siRNA transfection to dissect signaling mechanisms. Molecular and cellular responses were evaluated by immunoblotting, immunofluorescence, ELISA, TUNEL staining, and ROS detection. Cell death, cytokine expression, and tissue injury were quantified via standard assays.
resultswe demonstrated that the STING signaling axis drives parthanatos and intestinal injury through endoplasmic reticulum (ER) oxidative stress. Mechanistically, STING directly interacts with ER oxidoreductase 1 (ERO1), inducing oxidative stress and cytosolic ROS accumulation, which triggers DNA damage, PARP1 hyperactivation, and excessive PARylation. This cascade promotes the nuclear translocation of apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) and Parthanatos. Notably, this mechanism occurred independently of the canonical cGAS–TBK1–interferon axis. Genetic deletion or pharmacological inhibition of STING, ERO1, or PARP1 significantly reduces ROS levels, PARylation, and intestinal injury.
conclusionsWe identified a novel STING–ERO1–PARP1 signaling cascade that links innate immune sensing to redox dysregulation and cell death, providing new therapeutic targets for mitigating organ injury in sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.