ArticleParasites & vectors2026
Investigating habitat preferences and host-feeding behavior of mosquito disease vectors on commercial swine farms in the USA.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMosquito feeding behavior and habitat preferences strongly influence arbovirus transmission, particularly for viruses where swine serve as amplifying hosts. The high density of pigs in commercial operations poses a potential risk for severe outbreaks if mosquito-borne pathogens were to be introduced. This study characterizes habitat preferences and feeding behavior of mosquito species on commercial swine farms in the USA.
methodsOverall, ten farms (five sow and five wean-to-market [WTM] farms) were sampled biweekly from June to October 2024. At each farm, resting mosquitoes were collected outdoors using aspirators, while light traps were deployed indoors and outdoors to trap host-seeking mosquitoes. Blood-fed females from all capture methods underwent DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and Sanger sequencing to identify mosquito species and vertebrate hosts. Generalized linear mixed models were used to evaluate associations between habitat, location, and calendar period with the abundance of resting and blood-fed mosquitoes.
resultsIn this study, 3009 resting mosquitoes (both males and females) were collected. Vegetation habitats consistently harbored more resting and male mosquitoes than water bodies (P ≤ 0.02), on both sow and WTM farms. A total of 444 blood-fed female mosquitoes were captured, of which 25.7% (114/444) were captured on sow farms and 74.3% (330/444) on WTM farms. On WTM farms, the abundance of blood-fed mosquitoes was significantly higher indoors than outdoors (P < 0.01). Across production systems, the dominant blood-fed species were Anopheles quadrimaculatus (n = 157), Culex pipiens (n = 105), Aedes vexans (n = 65), Culex salinarius (n = 46), and Anopheles punctipennis (n = 45). Pigs accounted for the majority of blood meals (n = 384), followed by white-tailed deer (n = 38), cattle (n = 11), and birds (n = 11). The probability of mosquitoes feeding on pigs compared with other hosts was significantly higher from late June through mid-September (P < 0.01).
conclusionsThis study provides baseline data on mosquito habitat preferences and feeding behavior on US commercial swine farms. Routine mosquito vector surveillance and targeted control measures, both indoors and in surrounding habitats, should be integrated into herd biosecurity programs to mitigate mosquito-associated health risks in commercial swine operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.