Evidence mapPaperPMID 41821192Full record

ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2026

Evidence Mapping: Healthy Eating and Physical Activity Practice Elements in Early Childhood Education and Care.

Melanie Lum, Alice Grady, Luke Giles, Heidi Turon, Nicole Pearson, Ana Renda, Luke Wolfenden, Sze Lin Yoong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Evidence Mapping: Healthy Eating and Physical Activity Practice Elements in Early Childhood Education and Care.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Melanie LumGlobal Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2371-6549
Alice GradySchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Luke GilesPopulation Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6849-9325
Heidi TuronSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Nicole PearsonSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Ana RendaSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4319-2447
Luke WolfendenSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Sze Lin YoongGlobal Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

Heart Foundation 102518National Health and Medical Research Council APP1153479NHMRC APP1197022Wellcome Trust 106654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany health and government organisations have developed recommendations to promote the healthy eating and physical activity of children attending early childhood education and care (ECEC) settings. However, the evidence supporting these recommendations is not well described. An examination of the current evidence is needed to support decision-makers to understand and prioritise practices for implementation.

aimTo utilise a novel systematic evidence-mapping process which: (i) examines the evidence-base underpinning ECEC-based healthy eating and physical activity practice elements; and (ii) classifies practice elements according to the World Health Organization (WHO) Standards for Healthy Eating, Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour and Sleep in Early Childhood and Care Settings to examine alignment with current global guidelines.

methodsWe undertook a two-stage, five-step systematic process, involving identifying existing evidence and conducting a secondary data analysis and synthesis of the evidence underpinning practice elements.

resultsSixteen healthy eating and 19 physical activity practice elements were assessed as likely beneficial. Most of these mapped to WHO Standard 2: Creating supportive environments. Seven practice elements were assessed as possibly beneficial, two as possibly not beneficial and none as not beneficial. There was insufficient evidence to assess 39 practice elements.

conclusionsThis study provides insights into the evidence underpinning practice elements included in ECEC-based guidelines, identifies evidence-based practice elements not included in existing guidelines and highlights opportunities where evidence can be strengthened. SO WHAT?: The evidence underpinning guideline recommendations is variable or non-existent. Evaluation around the implementation of guidelines within funded programs is needed.

Indexed as

Child Day Care CentersDiet, HealthyExerciseHealth PromotionChild, PreschoolHumansSedentary BehaviorSleep

Identifiers

PMID41821192
PMCPMC12982912

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.