SynthesisFrontiers in neurology
Effects of brain-computer interface-based rehabilitation on lower limb function and activities of daily living after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lower limb motor dysfunction is a common sequela of stroke that significantly impacts patients' walking safety and independence in daily living. Although brain-computer interface (BCI) technology has demonstrated efficacy in upper limb rehabilitation, its effects on lower limb recovery have not yet been systematically evaluated. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across seven databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, SinoMed, VIP Database, and Wanfang Data.) to identify studies investigating BCI for post-stroke lower limb dysfunction, encompassing records published up to September 2025. All statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager software (version 5.4.1). Results: Thirteen studies involving 582 participants were included. BCI training significantly improved the scores of Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Lower Extremity (FMA-LE, Conclusion: BCI-based training is an effective approach for improving lower limb recovery after stroke, demonstrating benefits in motor function, balance, and functional mobility. While evidence for certain outcomes remains limited, the dose-dependent effect on daily living activities underscores the importance of sufficient training duration. Future research should validate these findings and clarify effects across a broader range of functional measures. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251150558, identifier: CRD420251150558.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.