ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Mobile cognitive assessment demonstrates diagnostic equivalence to MMSE and MoCA scales in Alzheimer's disease screening.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing the Relationship Between Volumetric Changes and Functional Connectivity in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most common neurodegenerative disorder, poses significant challenges for early screening due to the clinical and environmental constraints of traditional neuropsychological assessments. Methods: This study developed a mobile terminal-based cognitive assessment system (mCAS) and prospectively validated its screening efficacy through a diagnostic trial. We recruited 63 memory clinic patients (aged 20-75 years), all of whom independently completed mCAS testing after undergoing standardized MMSE and MoCA evaluations. Through a systematic review of 10 existing mild cognitive impairment (MCI) screening tools, we extracted 25 test items to construct the assessment framework. Results: Our results demonstrated that, under the optimal Gradient Boosting model, mCAS achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.884 for discriminating MCI while maintaining diagnostic equivalence in sensitivity compared to conventional instruments ( Discussion: The system's core innovations include: (1) A multimodal digital assessment framework that overcomes the environmental limitations of conventional scales; (2) Self-administration capability in non-medical settings; and (3) A dynamic cognitive baseline model to facilitate longitudinal monitoring. mCAS provides a convenient screening solution for early AD detection, with significant potential particularly in resource-limited regions. Future multicenter validation and biomarker integration studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.