ArticleJournal of clinical medicine research2026
Investigating Factors Influencing Disease Progression in Patients With Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With no approved pharmacological treatments for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in Taiwan, identifying protective and risk factors is crucial for preventing disease progression. Given the clinical heterogeneity of NAFLD, this study aimed to identify clinically meaningful NAFLD phenotypes using electronic medical records (EMRs) and unsupervised clustering, stratify risk across different clusters, identify factors associated with disease progression, and derive a parsimonious set of predictors for high-risk phenotypes. Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort study conducted in three steps with iterative model training. In step 1, patients diagnosed with NAFLD were identified, and all relevant patient data were extracted, followed by clustering analysis using the k-prototype algorithm. In step 2, survival analysis and Cox regression were applied to perform risk stratification across clusters. In step 3, Lasso regression, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to identify potential protective and risk factors associated with NAFLD and to derive a parsimonious set of predictors for high-risk phenotypes across different risk strata. Results: Step 1: The analysis of 6,023 patients identified four distinct phenotypic clusters. The first cluster had the most severe disease, the second the least. Step 2: Among 4,998 patients, the first cluster faced the highest risk for all outcomes, with a median survival of 3.06 years, significantly different from the others. There was no significant risk difference between the second and third clusters. Step 3: A comparison of the highest-risk and lowest-risk clusters finally identified 17 potential variables. Conclusions: Using multiple analytical models, this study identified 17 potential risk factors associated with NAFLD progression. Their combined assessment may inform future risk stratification and hypothesis generation. Further validation is required before clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.