ArticleNeurology. Genetics2026
Plasma isomiRs as Candidate Biomarkers for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.
Article in Neurology. Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Objectives: There are no FDA-approved diagnostic biomarkers for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). TDP-43 is a known cofactor in the cleavage of long premature microRNAs (miRNAs) into their short, mature products. isomiRs are miRNA variants that differ in their 5' and 3' end points and regulate distinct mRNA targets. In this study, we tested the hypotheses that circulating isomiR profiles differ in the context of TAR DNA-binding Protein pathology and that isomiRs are superior to miRNAs for classification of ALS. Methods: We obtained RNA from plasma samples of 14 patients with ALS and 14 age-matched and sex-matched controls for sequencing on a NextSeq 2000. Data were processed using Unique Molecular Identifier tools and a custom pipeline designed to match miRNA variant sequences without mismatches. Differential expression (DE) was identified using DEseq2 at FDR ≤ 0.1. XGBoost classifiers were built using a subset of (Model 1) isomiRs or (Model 2) miRNAs that were present above a median threshold in all sequencing batches. Parameters were tuned using grid search and 10-fold cross-validation while training to distinguish ALS samples from controls among a single large public data set. Models were then validated on in-house samples and 1 publicly available holdout data set. Results: Fourteen (0.2%), 355 (2.7%), and 14 (0.7%) isomiRs were differentially expressed in in-house plasma, public ALS plasma, and public ALS serum, respectively. One (0.1%), 94 (5.5%), and 13 (2.4%) miRNAs were differentially expressed, respectively. Model 1 accurately classified in-house ALS plasma and public ALS serum (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.87) and did not distinguish 40 of 41 Alzheimer disease samples from control plasma (GSE215789; AUC = 0.47) or 60 of 77 Parkinson disease samples from control whole blood (GSE180193; AUC = 0.55). In comparison, Model 2 using miRNAs performed worse on in-house plasma (AUC = 0.49). Discussion: Analyzing individual isomiRs may improve the performance of circulating noncoding RNAs as diagnostic biomarkers of ALS.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.