ArticleWorld journal of oncology2026
Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Analysis Reveals Causal Associations Between Autoimmune Diseases and Colorectal Cancer.
Article in World journal of oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Observational studies have reported associations between autoimmune diseases (AIDs) and colorectal cancer (CRC), but whether these relationships are causal remains unclear. Methods: We performed a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to evaluate the causal effects of eight prevalent AIDs-systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), gout, multiple sclerosis (MS), celiac disease (CD), eczema, and asthma-on CRC risk, and to examine the possibility of reverse causation. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics from individuals of European ancestry were analyzed. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) approach served as the primary MR estimator, with MR-Egger regression and the weighted median method applied as complementary analyses. Robustness was further evaluated through sensitivity analyses, including assessments of heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy. Results: Genetically predicted CD was associated with a reduced risk of CRC (IVW odds ratio (OR) = 0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.89-0.99; P = 0.028). Genetically predicted RA was associated with an increased risk of CRC (IVW OR = 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.11; P = 0.004). No significant causal associations were observed for the other AIDs. Reverse MR provided no evidence that genetic liability to CRC causally influenced the risk of these AIDs. Sensitivity analyses supported the stability of the findings. Conclusions: This bidirectional MR study provides genetic evidence supporting unidirectional, modest causal effects of specific AIDs (CD and RA) on CRC risk. Further studies are warranted to clarify underlying mechanisms, including immune dysregulation, inflammation, and dietary factors, and to determine clinical implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.