Evidence mapPaperPMID 41822345Full record

ReviewMedicine international

Artificial intelligence in oncology: Current status and possibilities (Review).

Abhavya Roy, Apurva Bhoyar, Ashok Ahirwar, Yogesh Pawade, Nilesh Chandra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicine international. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abhavya RoyUniversity College of Medical Sciences, Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi 110095, India.
Apurva BhoyarDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra 441108, India.
Ashok AhirwarDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
Yogesh PawadeDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra 441108, India.
Nilesh ChandraIndian Council of Medical Research, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi 110029, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly reshaping oncology by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, improving prognostication and enabling personalized treatment planning. The present review aimed to critically synthesize the contemporary landscape of AI applications across cancer imaging, digital pathology, clinical outcome prediction, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Recent advances in machine learning and deep learning, particularly convolutional neural networks and transformer-based architectures, have demonstrated robust performance in lesion detection, tumour grading, survival prediction and treatment optimization, in several instances approaching or exceeding expert-level accuracy. Despite these advances, translation into routine clinical practice remains limited due to dataset bias, limited generalizability, the lack of standardized data protocols, insufficient interpretability and regulatory barriers. Ethical challenges related to fairness, transparency and equitable access are especially relevant in low- and middle-income countries. Emerging frontiers, including multimodal AI, foundation models, federated learning, and explainable AI, provide potential solutions to these challenges. Multidisciplinary collaboration, rigorous prospective validation and robust ethical governance will be essential to realize the full potential of AI in advancing precision oncology and improving global cancer outcomes.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecancer imagingdeep learningdigital pathologymachine learningoncologypersonalized cancer treatmentpredictive oncologyradiomics

Identifiers

PMID41822345
PMCPMC12976659

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.