ArticleVeterinary world2026
Comparative lobe-specific histomorphometric evaluation of pulmonary architecture, fibrosis, and alveolar macrophage distribution in swine raised under different management systems.
Article in Veterinary world, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Swine housing and management systems strongly influence respiratory health through their effects on air quality, ventilation, and environmental exposure. However, quantitative, lobe-specific evidence describing how different management systems affect pulmonary microarchitecture remains limited. This study aimed to compare alveolar structure, fibrosis, collagen deposition, and alveolar macrophage distribution in swine raised under hygienic, beta-agonist-free rearing, and free-range systems. Materials and Methods: Fifteen clinically healthy male crossbred (Large White × Landrace) swine were allocated to three management systems (n = 5 per group): hygienic, beta-agonist-free rearing, and free-range. Lung samples were collected from the right cranial, middle, and caudal lobes following humane slaughter. Sections were stained with Masson's trichrome for collagen visualization. Quantitative histomorphometric analyses included alveolar wall thickness, alveolar space area, fibrosis distribution (%), semi-quantitative fibrosis score, collagen intensity (mean gray value) in bronchial hyaline cartilage, and alveolar macrophage density (AMD). Image analysis was performed using ImageJ, and observers were blinded to group allocation. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance with Tukey's post hoc test (p < 0.05). Results: Marked lobe-specific differences were observed among management systems. Swine raised under beta-agonist-free rearing exhibited significantly thicker alveolar walls, reduced alveolar space area, higher fibrosis distribution and scores, increased collagen accumulation, and elevated AMD, particularly in the middle and caudal lobes. In contrast, free-range swine demonstrated thinner alveolar septa, wider alveolar spaces, lower fibrosis indices, and reduced macrophage infiltration, indicating preserved pulmonary architecture and reduced inflammatory remodeling. The hygienic group consistently showed intermediate values across most parameters, reflecting balanced structural adaptation under controlled housing conditions. Conclusion: Swine management systems are associated with distinct patterns of pulmonary structural and immunological adaptation. Beta-agonist-free rearing was linked to early fibrotic remodeling and increased immune activation, whereas free-range management supported structural preservation and lower inflammatory burden. This study provides the first quantitative, lobe-specific histomorphometric comparison of pulmonary remodeling across different swine management systems, offering valuable insights for welfare-oriented and sustainable livestock production strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.