Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41822605›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

A Comparative Study of Oral Tofacitinib and Oral Methotrexate in the Treatment of Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis.

Pooja Unnikrishnan, Kirankanth Vudayana, Dilipchandra Chintada, Mohammed Khatija Begum, Sai Sriya Chalamalasetty, Pallavi Gullipalli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pooja UnnikrishnanDermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, IND.
Kirankanth VudayanaDermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, IND.
Dilipchandra ChintadaDermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, IND.
Mohammed Khatija BegumDermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, IND.
Sai Sriya ChalamalasettyDermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, IND.
Pallavi GullipalliDermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Chronic plaque psoriasis is a common immune-mediated dermatosis that often requires long-term systemic therapy in patients with moderate to severe disease. Methotrexate has been a cornerstone of systemic treatment for decades; however, concerns regarding delayed onset of action, cumulative toxicity, and the need for close laboratory monitoring have driven interest in newer targeted oral therapies. Tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, modulates multiple cytokine signaling pathways implicated in psoriasis pathogenesis, though comparative data from the Indian population remain limited. Objectives The present study aimed to compare the efficacy, time to response, relapse rates, and safety profile of oral tofacitinib versus oral methotrexate in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Methods This prospective, randomized, open-label comparative study was conducted over 18 months (August 2023 to January 2025) at Great Eastern Medical School & Hospital, a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India. Adult patients with biopsy-proven chronic plaque psoriasis of at least three months' duration, a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score greater than 10, and body surface area involvement exceeding 10% were enrolled. Forty-two eligible patients were randomized into two groups: Group A (n = 21) received oral tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily, while Group B (n = 21) received oral methotrexate 10 mg once weekly with folic acid supplementation. Clinical assessment using PASI was performed at baseline and at two, four, eight, 12, and 16 weeks. Treatment efficacy, PASI 75 and PASI 90 responses, time to PASI 75, relapse, and adverse events were analyzed. Results Both treatment groups demonstrated a progressive and statistically significant reduction in mean PASI scores over the 16-week treatment period, with no statistically significant difference in mean PASI reduction between the two groups at individual follow-up visits. Tofacitinib showed a faster onset of action, with a higher proportion of patients achieving PASI 75 by week 12 (57.1%), whereas methotrexate demonstrated a higher cumulative PASI 75 response by week 16 (71.4%). Achievement of PASI 90 at week 16 was significantly higher in the tofacitinib group compared to the methotrexate group (57.1% vs. 19.0%; p < 0.05). Relapse was observed more frequently in the methotrexate group, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Mild elevation of liver enzymes was the most commonly observed adverse effect in both groups, and no serious adverse events were recorded. Conclusion Oral tofacitinib and methotrexate are both effective systemic therapies for moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Tofacitinib offers the advantage of faster and deeper clinical clearance, while methotrexate demonstrates comparable efficacy over a longer treatment duration. Tofacitinib may be considered a useful oral alternative in patients requiring rapid disease control.

Indexed as

chronic plaque psoriasisjanus kinase inhibitorsmethotrexatepsoriasis area and severity indextofacitinib

Identifiers

PMID41822605
PMCPMC12977288

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.