Evidence mapPaperPMID 41822671Full record

ReviewCureus2026

More Questions Than Answers: A Narrative Review of the Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation.

Robert N Bilkovski, Jo Ann K LeQuang, Joseph Pergolizzi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robert N BilkovskiClinical Department, Native Cardio, Tampa, USA.
Jo Ann K LeQuangScientific Communications Department, NEMA Research, Inc., Naples, USA.
Joseph PergolizziPain Medicine Department, NEMA Research, Inc, Naples, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) lacks a consensus definition but is generally considered to be atrial fibrillation (AF) that develops following surgery. There is disagreement as to whether POAF must be de novo or whether a patient with a history of AF episodes can have true POAF. POAF has been more studied after cardiac versus noncardiac surgery, but this may be the result of less postoperative cardiac monitoring after noncardiac surgery. POAF can be clinically silent, paroxysmal, and self-terminating, or it may persist and have the potential to evolve into more chronic forms of AF. The pathogenesis of POAF has yet to be fully elucidated. A recent study indicates that postoperative atrial flutter may occur more often than previously thought and may be underestimated as a postoperative risk. Cancer surgeries have high rates of POAF, particularly following surgeries for lung, colorectal, gastrointestinal, and hematologic cancers. Among the best-known POAF risk factors are older age, male sex, White race, duration of surgery, comorbidities, and history of cardiac disease. The Black paradox of POAF finds that Black patients have more risk factors and more severe risk factors than White patients for POAF, yet Black patients are less likely to develop POAF than White patients. However, a Black patient with POAF is more likely to have a worse outcome than a White patient. A female paradox has also come to light, because women often have more risk factors for POAF than men but develop POAF less often; however, when POAF occurs in females, they can have severe outcomes. Urgently needed is a consensus definition of POAF to support epidemiologic and clinical work, and more widely used monitoring and surveillance tools to detect POAF when it does occur.

Indexed as

adult cardiac surgerycardiac surgeryepidemiology of postoperative atrial fibrillationnoncardiac surgerypostoperative atrial fibrillationracial disparitiessex-based disparities

Identifiers

PMID41822671
PMCPMC12978295

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.