ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Personalized Insights Derived from Wearable Device Data and Large Language Models to Improve Well-Being.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Health behaviors such as physical activity and sleep affect mental health, but the effect of each health behavior varies substantially across individuals, limiting the usefulness of generic behavioral recommendations. We collected one year of continuous wearable and ecological momentary assessment data from 3,139 participants in the Intern Health Study (2018-2023), and examined individual-level associations between wearable-derived features and mood across the internship year. The behaviors associated with mood were highly heterogeneous between individuals: the two most prevalent drivers of mood were wake-up time (the strongest driver for 34.0% of subjects) and step count (10.6% of subjects). The correlation directionality remained largely stable despite fluctuations in strength. Interestingly, 20.3% of subjects showed no significant correlations. These findings highlight the limitations of population-level recommendations and the critical need for personalized, data-driven approaches to mental health assessment and intervention. To translate these personalized insights into actionable support, we developed MoodDriver, a large language models (LLM)-powered system that generates tailored feedback emails based on each participant's behavioral and physiological patterns. This work demonstrates the feasibility of combining digital phenotyping with large language models to advance precision digital mental health for high-risk populations.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.