ArticleCardiology research2026
Assessment of No-Reflow in Patients With STEMI After Intracoronary Tirofiban After Opening of the Vessel.
Article in Cardiology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: No-reflow phenomenon (NRP) following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) remains a critical determinant of adverse outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) cases despite successful epicardial recanalization. The core purpose of this study was to establish the value of intracoronary (IC) tirofiban, delivered via the IC route, in mitigating the occurrence of NRP for STEMI cases subsequent to successful vessel reopening. Methods: This randomized controlled double-blind study enrolled 60 STEMI cases. Following successful PCI, cases with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade less than 3 were randomized to receive either IC tirofiban (25 ug/kg) or saline 0.9% as placebo, in addition to standard pre-procedural therapy with aspirin, heparin, and ticagrelor. TIMI flow grade and incidence of NRP were evaluated. Additionally, ST-T normalization in electrocardiogram (ECG) was assessed. Bleeding complications and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were recorded during hospitalization and at 30-day follow-up. Results: The tirofiban group demonstrated notably superior coronary flow restoration with 80% achieving TIMI 3 flow versus 46.67% in controls (P = 0.007). NRP occurred in 20% of tirofiban cases compared to 53.33% in controls (P = 0.007). Minor bleeding complications increased in the tirofiban group (26.67% versus 3.33%, P = 0.026), while major bleeding remained absent in both groups. Total in-hospital MACEs were notably reduced with tirofiban treatment compared to controls (3.33% versus 30%, P = 0.012). Conclusions: In STEMI cases following PPCI, IC tirofiban administration effectively reduces NRP, improves coronary flow restoration, and reduces MACE despite increased minor bleeding risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.