ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
From apremilast to JAK inhibitors-salvage treatment strategies for refractory palmoplantar pustulosis: case series.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deucravacitinib in dermatology: current indication and existing off-label data.Drugs in context · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition characterized primarily by recurrent episodes of blisters and sterile pustules on the palms and soles. It is frequently accompanied by disruption of the skin barrier and intense itching or pain. Currently, there is a lack of standardized treatment protocols for PPP therapy. Traditional first-line therapies primarily include topical corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and localized phototherapy, which offer limited efficacy and are prone to recurrence. Although apremilast (APR) has been reported for use in refractory PPP, its efficacy varies among individuals. This study aims to explore the value of a rescue therapy strategy switching to JAK inhibitors after APR treatment failure. Methods: This study is a single-center retrospective case series analysis, enrolling a total of 9 patients with refractory PPP who remained unresponsive to conventional therapy and APR (30 mg twice daily). All patients discontinued APR and initiated JAK inhibitor therapy (tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily). Concurrently record patients' baseline characteristics, including comorbidities, smoking history, prior medications, baseline skin lesion severity (PPPASI score), skin lesion status before tofacitinib use, and adverse reactions during follow-up. Results: Our nine patients responded exceptionally well to tofacitinib. By the end of 12 weeks of treatment, the PPPASI scores of all nine patients had significantly decreased. Among them, eight patients achieved PPPASI50 (88.9%), and one patient achieved PPPASI75 (11.1%). The smallest reduction in PPPASI score from baseline was 2.4 points, and the largest reduction was 16.4 points. No serious adverse events were reported during treatment and follow-up. Conclusion: For refractory PPP patients who fail APR therapy, switching to JAK inhibitors serves as an effective rescue treatment strategy, with most patients achieving remission within a short period and demonstrating good tolerability. This approach offers a viable treatment option for PPP that has proven resistant to conventional therapies and phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitors. Still, its long-term efficacy and safety require validation through large-scale prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.