ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2026
Sugammadex vs Neostigmine for Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade and Association with Postoperative Atelectasis After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.
Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnesium deficiency and long-term incident dementia among COVID-19 survivors: a propensity score-matched cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- COVID-19 and long-term risk of incident laboratory-defined micronutrient deficiency in patients with type 2 diabetes: a multicenter propensity score-matched cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Long-term risk of incident dementia following documented COVID-19 among older adults with type 2 diabetes: a propensity score-matched cohort study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Postoperative atelectasis remains a significant concern after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). This study aimed to evaluate the association between sugammadex use and postoperative atelectasis in patients who underwent VATS. Patients and methods: From the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network (2016-2024), adults undergoing elective VATS who received rocuronium reversed with either sugammadex or neostigmine were identified. The primary outcome was atelectasis within 30 days, identified using the administrative ICD diagnostic codes recorded in the TriNetX database. The secondary outcomes included pneumonia, acute respiratory failure, pneumothorax, sepsis, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Outcomes were additionally assessed at 7-day and 90-day intervals. Results: After propensity score matching (1:1), 7345 patients were analyzed per group. Sugammadex exposure was associated with lower odds of atelectasis at 30 days (odds ratio [OR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.86; P < 0.001), corresponding to an absolute risk reduction of 3.3% (15.3% vs 18.6%). The association remained consistent at 7-day (OR, 0.75) and 90-day (OR, 0.81) follow-ups. Time-to-event analysis demonstrated a lower hazard of atelectasis (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.76-0.88). Sugammadex was also associated with reduced pneumothorax (OR, 0.90) and MACEs (OR, 0.75), but not with pneumonia, respiratory failure, or sepsis. Subgroup analyses revealed significant interactions between sex (P = 0.003) and obesity status (P = 0.047), with more pronounced associations in males and non-obese patients. Conclusion: Sugammadex use was associated with a reduced postoperative atelectasis risk in patients undergoing VATS. Prospective randomized trials are warranted to confirm these findings and establish causality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.