Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41822937›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Interpretable machine learning for identifying adolescent obesity risk and identifying key determinants.

Liepeng Huang, Jie Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Liepeng HuangFaculty of Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Jie ChenShandong Transport Vocational College, Weifang, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study utilizes interpretable machine learning to identify and prioritize key associated factors for adolescent obesity across individual, family, and school domains, as well as to establish specific risk thresholds that can inform targeted interventions. Methods: Data were obtained from the China Education Panel Survey (CEPS), which included 7,397 adolescents. Six ML models (SVM, XGBoost, LightGBM, LR, RF, MLP) were developed and evaluated. The best-performing model was interpreted using SHAP analysis to assess feature contributions. Results: The LightGBM model demonstrated the highest accuracy (0.8788). This study primarily focused on the accurate classification of adolescent obesity status within a clinical decision-making context. Consequently, accuracy was prioritized as the key metric for directly assessing the model's overall classification performance. Key predictors of this model sedentary time, school ranking, academic workload, birth weight, body image, family economic status, school location, household registration, and physical activity. Among these, sedentary behavior emerged as the most significant predictor. Specific risk thresholds were identified, including sedentary time exceeding 5 h on weekends and birth weight greater than 4.0 kg. Conclusion: This study underscores the utility of interpretable ML in identifying key predictors associated with adolescent obesity. The findings suggest that interventions might prioritize reducing sedentary behavior, the moderation of academic workload, and the enhancement of body image perception. Additionally, family and school environments play crucial roles in the prevention of obesity.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPediatric ObesityAdolescentBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsChinaClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMalePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSedentary Behavioradolescentsinterpretable machine learningobesityrelative importancesedentary time

Identifiers

PMID41822937
PMCPMC12975944

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.