ArticleEpilepsia2026
Perturbation-induced responses improved seizure forecasting in epileptic rats.
Article in Epilepsia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe unpredictability of seizures is one of the most challenging aspects of uncontrolled epilepsy for patients. Prior work forecasting seizure risk has measured changes in passive intracranial electroencephalographic (EEG) signals, but currently, there are no such clinical devices available. Based upon dynamical theory, we hypothesized that the response of the brain to perturbing stimulation provides a robust measurement of seizure risk that outperforms the results from passive EEG.
methodsTo test the hypothesis, we performed more than 8 weeks of periodic electrical stimulation and continuous EEG recordings in epileptic rats induced by intrahippocampal injection of tetanus toxin, in which seizures started spontaneously.
resultsUsing the perturbation-evoked responses as a predictive biomarker of seizure risk, we built a preictal detection system that had excellent accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve > .95) at distinguishing the preictal from the interictal states. In comparison, a similar preictal detection system that used only passive features from the same experimental animals was unable to identify the preictal state better than chance. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results advocate for perturbation to be used for seizure prediction purposes, which could improve the efficacy of seizure forecasting when applied clinically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.