Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41823482›Full record

ArticleJMIR infodemiology2026

Emotional Expression and Mental Health Support in BTS Fandom Communities Using Natural Language Processing on YouTube Comments: Cross-Sectional Study.

Nari Yoo, Aaron H Rodwin, Michael Park, Sangpil Youm, Sou Hyun Jang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR infodemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nari YooSchool of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8467-7048
Aaron H RodwinSilver School of Social Work, New York University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5288-0535
Michael ParkSchool of Social Work, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7456-8868
Sangpil YoumDepartment of Computer & Information Science & Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7234-0395
Sou Hyun JangDepartment of Sociology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2265-4753

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe global rise of K-pop has shaped youth culture and online communities, particularly through BTS, a South Korean boy band with an international fanbase known as ARMY (Adorable Representative MC for Youth). Music fandoms are increasingly engaging with digital platforms such as YouTube not only for entertainment but also as spaces for emotional expression and mutual support. Despite growing interest in the mental health potential of music-based coping strategies, limited research has examined how fandom cultures differentially express emotional needs and supportive interactions online.

objectiveThis study investigates specific mental health language patterns and coping mechanisms expressed by BTS fans in online spaces, examining how different linguistic features (including self-referential language and emotional expression patterns) may reflect psychological states and mental health needs. We used YouTube comments from fan-curated "sad" or "depression" playlists of BTS. We further included YouTube comments from equivalent Taylor Swift playlists as a reference group.

methodsUsing natural language processing and Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count 2022 software, we analyzed a total of 13,224 YouTube comments: 11,772 comments on BTS "sad playlist" videos and 1452 comments on Taylor Swift equivalents. Statistical comparisons were conducted to evaluate differences in comment length, word count, pronoun use, and emotional valence. Representative comments were examined to contextualize the emotion classification results.

resultsBTS original comments were significantly longer (mean 253.38, SD 703.65 characters) and had higher word counts (mean 38.93, SD 88.54 words) than Taylor Swift original comments (length: mean 89.84, SD 330.96 characters; word count: mean 16.08, SD 64.78 words; P<.001). BTS fans used more first-person singular pronouns (mean 10.24%, SD 9.57% vs mean 7.43%, SD 9.41%) and expressed greater sadness (1691/5341, 31.7% vs 75/452, 16.6%). In contrast, Taylor Swift fans exhibited higher admiration (86/452, 19% vs 429/5341, 8%). Among reply comments, BTS fans demonstrated more caring (242/1729, 14% vs 7/128, 5.5%), gratitude (294/1729, 17% vs 15/128, 11.7%), and optimism (162/1729, 9.4% vs 6/128, 4.7%). Linguistic analysis also revealed a broader international user base for BTS, including higher proportions of Spanish (719/11,772, 6.11%) and Portuguese (222/11,772, 1.89%) comments. Examination of comment content showed that fans used these spaces to disclose personal struggles, express gratitude for the community, and offer peer support, with many describing the fandom as a safe space for emotional expression they could not access elsewhere.

conclusionsThe findings show that comments on BTS fan playlists included more emotional disclosure and more supportive replies than those on the Taylor Swift comparison, consistent with fan communities operating as informal sites of peer support online. These results suggest implications for culturally responsive, community-based, and digitally mediated mental health interventions among youth and global populations.

Indexed as

EmotionsMental HealthNatural Language ProcessingSocial MediaSocial SupportCross-Sectional StudiesDigital MediaHumansMaleRepublic of KoreaBTSemotional expressionK-pop fandomLIWCmental healthmusic-based copingnatural language processingonline peer supportTaylor SwiftYouTube comments

Identifiers

PMID41823482
PMCPMC13575550

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.