Trial reportRadiology. Imaging cancer2026
Quantifying Functional Liver Volume Loss after CT-guided Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: A COVER-ALL Trial Post Hoc Analysis.
Trial report in Radiology. Imaging cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose To quantify functional liver volume (FLV) loss relative to minimal ablative margins (MAMs) achieved during percutaneous thermal ablation (TA) of liver tumors in COVER-ALL randomized controlled trial (RCT) participants. Materials and Methods In the COVER-ALL single-center RCT (June 2020 through October 2023), software-based ablation confirmation (AC) (experimental) and visual margin (control) assessment were compared among participants with histology-agnostic liver tumors. In this post hoc analysis, the authors compared CT-derived volumes, MAMs, and changes in laboratory-based hepatic function using Wilcoxon rank sum and Spearman correlation tests. Results Among 100 participants (mean age ± SD, 57.8 years ± 13.2; 61 male; experimental group,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.