SynthesisRadiology. Imaging cancer2026
Digital Twins in Neuro-Oncology: A Systematic Review of Current Implementations, Technical Strategies, and Clinical Applications.
Synthesis in Radiology. Imaging cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for High-Grade Gliomas: Current Evidence, Clinical Applications and Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Narrative Review of Digital Twins in the Health Domain: Development, Application, and Evidence Consolidation.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose To perform a systematic review evaluating current digital twin (DT) implementations, highlighting clinical relevance and technical strategies, and identifying opportunities to advance personalized, predictive care in neuro-oncology. Materials and Methods PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were systematically screened for English-language original research articles published from inception through June 2025 focused on DT development, validation, or patient-specific computational models in neuro-oncology. Extracted variables included computational frameworks, data sources, clinical or predictive tasks, and reported outcomes. Risk of bias and applicability were assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST), which revealed well-defined predictors and outcomes but frequent concerns regarding participants and analysis. Results Of the 73 articles reviewed, 21 met eligibility criteria. DTs simulated tumor growth, radiation response, immune interactions, and drug transport.Most models (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.