Evidence mapPaperPMID 41823653Full record

ReviewExperimental physiology2026

Therapeutic potential of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) in dysglycaemia and metabolic dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis across the diabetes spectrum.

Ali Jafari, Helia Mardani, Mohammad Amin Karimi, MohammadHossein Sahami Gilan, Helia Hemmat, Fatemeh Shoja, Nooshin Enayati Soofi, Ghazaleh Eslamian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ali JafariStudent Research Committee, Department of Community Nutrition, Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7343-027X
Helia MardaniStudents' Scientific Research Center (SSRC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Amin KarimiSchool of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
MohammadHossein Sahami GilanDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran.
Helia HemmatElectronic Health and Statistics Surveillance Research Center, SRC, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh ShojaSchool of Health, Larestan University of Medical Sciences, Larestan, Iran.
Nooshin Enayati SoofiElectronic Health and Statistics Surveillance Research Center, SRC, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Ghazaleh EslamianDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Nutrition, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8960-5123

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate comprehensively the therapeutic potential of Abelmoschus esculentus (okra) supplementation across the diabetes spectrum of key metabolic risk factors. A search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library, up to 23 July 2025, to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of okra supplementation on metabolic risk factors in diabetes. Fourteen randomized controlled trials published between 2020 and 2025, including a total of 836 participants, were analysed. Okra supplementation led to significant reductions in 2 h postprandial glucose [weighted mean difference (WMD) = -22.39 mg/dL, 95% confidence interval (CI): -41.39 to -3.38; P = 0.021], fasting blood sugar (WMD = -23.66 mg/dL, 95% CI: -34.20 to -13.12; P < 0.001), glycosylated haemoglobin (WMD = -0.30%, 95% CI: -0.59 to -0.02; P = 0.034), homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (WMD = -0.59 units, 95% CI: -1.01 to -0.18; P = 0.005), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (WMD = -8.55 mg/dL, 95% CI: -14.42 to -2.68; P = 0.004) and total cholesterol (WMD = -12.58 mg/dL, 95% CI: -22.78 to -2.37; P = 0.016) levels. The certainty of evidence was very low for most outcomes, except for diastolic blood pressure and glycosylated haemoglobin, which were rated as low. Regarding methodological quality, six trials were rated as good, two as fair and six as poor. Okra supplementation might improve glycaemic control and lipid profiles, indicating its potential as a complementary approach in diabetes management. Despite limitations from small and heterogeneous trials, these findings support future research on optimal dosing, safety and personalized applications in metabolic disease management.

Indexed as

Abelmoschus esculentusglycaemic profilelipid profilemeta‐analysisokra

Identifiers

PMID41823653
PMCPMC13394657

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.