ArticlePloS one2026
Quantifying the impact of great coaches on Olympic medal predictions: A CPD-D3 model analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The step-up effect of great coaches on Olympic performance has been widely recognized, but its dynamic influence mechanism and quantitative evaluation remain methodological challenges. This study proposes a Change-Point Driven Difference-in-Differences with Decay Model ([Formula: see text]), which integrates the CUSUM algorithm, dynamic difference method (DID), and exponential decay function. The Great Coach effect's nonlinear characteristics and time attenuation rule were analyzed systematically. First, based on the improved CUSUM algorithm to detect the abrupt points of performance, the dual test mechanism of medal continuity and competition size stability was introduced to filter the pseudo-abrupt signals (such as the host effect and short-term strategic interference). Secondly, a hierarchical DID model was used to quantify the net effect of heterogeneous coach turnover events to solve the problem of traditional methods ignoring the dynamic confounding bias and run-in period. Finally, the sustainability difference of the coaching effects is revealed by the half-life model. Empirical studies show that the effect half-life of a systematic coaching system (such as Zhou Jihong coaching the Chinese diving team) is more than 20 years, while the technology-driven intervention (such as the AI tactical optimization for Japanese judo) has a half-life of only 5.3 years. The model predicts that in the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics, the introduction of great coaches will enable the Brazilian swimming team to achieve a breakthrough from 0 to 5 medals (95% CI: 4.7-6.3). This study provides an explainable and predictive framework for the allocation of coaching resources in Olympic strategy, and its methodology can be extended to dynamic causal inference in policy evaluation and organizational management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.