Observational studyMedicine2026
Predictors of ineffective platelet transfusion in surgical ICU: A retrospective study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Platelet transfusion is commonly utilized in the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) to provide hemostatic support for patients with severe thrombocytopenia or bleeding. Ineffective platelet transfusion is described as either the expected platelet count increase or insufficient hemostasis following transfusion. This study sought to identify risk factors and assess their predictive value in improving patient outcomes. This was an observational, retrospective study. Clinical information was gathered from 302 platelet transfusion episodes that occurred in the surgical ICU at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, between June and December 2022. Based on the clinical bleeding improvement indices (drainage volume, hemoglobin level) and the 24 hour-corrected count increment, the patients were divided into effective and ineffective groups. Binomial logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for ineffective transfusion after univariate analysis was screened for significant variables (P < .05). The predictive performance of these factors was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Patients were separated into 2 groups: effective (n = 192) and ineffective (n = 110). Baseline comparisons demonstrated significant differences in surgery frequency (≤1 vs >1), liver disease, intraoperative bleeding (≤1600 vs >1600), procalcitonin (PCT) level, C-reactive protein level, splenomegaly, and age (≥65 vs <65 years) (P < .05). The total red blood cell transfusion volume and other indicators showed no intergroup differences (P > .05). Univariate logistic regression revealed a significant association (P < .05) between platelet transfusion refractoriness and these variables, including the total red blood cell transfusion volume. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified surgeries (>1) (odds ratio (OR) = 1.997, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.196-3.335; P = .008), splenomegaly (OR = 3.912, 95% CI: 2.277-6.720; P < .001), and PCT (OR = 1.030, 95% CI: 1.013-1.047; P < .001) as independent risk variables (P < .05). ROC curve analysis revealed that the area under the curve of the model was 0.706 (95% CI: 0.645-0.766), with a Youden index of 0.346, corresponding to an optimal cutoff value of 0.338, sensitivity of 66.40%, and specificity of 68.20%. The number of surgeries (>1), splenomegaly, and PCT level were independent risk factors for ineffective platelet transfusion, and the constructed model had moderate predictive efficacy, providing a reference for early clinical identification and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.