Trial reportMedicine2026
Effect of psychomotor rehabilitation on rehabilitation exercise in elderly patients with mental disorders and its impact on cognitive function and risk incidence.
Trial report in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the role of psychomotor rehabilitation in the rehabilitation exercise of elderly patients with mental disorders. Eighty-six elderly patients with mental disorders admitted to our hospital from May 2023 to May 2024 were selected as study subjects and randomly divided into 2 groups. The observation group (n = 41) received psychomotor rehabilitation, while the control group (n = 45) underwent conventional rehabilitation exercise. Both groups were continuously intervened for 10 weeks. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), internalized stigma of mental illness scale (a student evaluation version), social disability screening schedule, dysfunction assessment scale, and incidence of risk events were compared between the groups. Psychomotor rehabilitation demonstrates ideal effects, effectively enhancing cognitive function in elderly patients with mental disorders, reducing internalized stigma, improving dysfunctional conditions, alleviating social function deficits, and lowering the occurrence of risk events. It is safe and worthy of clinical application. Before intervention, there was no statistically significant difference in MoCA scores between the groups (P >.05). After intervention, the scores in attention, language ability, abstract thinking, and short-term memory improved in both groups, with the observation group showing significantly higher scores than the control group (P <.05). Before intervention, there was no significant difference in internalized stigma of mental illness scores between the groups (P >.05). After intervention, the scores for stigma resistance, alienation, social withdrawal, stereotype endorsement, discrimination, and total score decreased in both groups, with the observation group showing significantly lower scores than the control group (P <.05). Before intervention, there were no significant differences in social disability screening schedule and dysfunction assessment scale scores between groups (P >.05). After intervention, both scores decreased in both groups, with the observation group significantly lower than the control group (P <.05). The incidence of risk events (mania, aggression, impulsivity, falls, etc) in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P <.05).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.