Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41825740›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of nutrition2026

Effects of Soluble Corn Fiber Consumption on Executive Functions and Gut Microbiota in Middle to Older Age Adults: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial.

David A Alvarado, Tori A Holthaus, Shelby Martell, Nicole L Southey, Marco Atallah, Rhea Sarma, David Revilla, Marina Brown, Twinkle Mehta, Naiman A Khan and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05066425 (Soluble Corn Fiber for Promoting Executive Function Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05066425 naunknown statusnot on this map

Soluble Corn Fiber for Promoting Executive Function Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignRan2021 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsHealthArmsSoluble Corn Fiber, Maltodextrin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

David A AlvaradoDivision of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States; Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.
Tori A HolthausDivision of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.
Shelby MartellNeuroscience Program, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.
Nicole L SoutheyDivision of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.
Marco AtallahDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.
Rhea SarmaDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.
David RevillaDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.
Marina BrownDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.
Twinkle MehtaDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.
Naiman A KhanDivision of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States; Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States; Department of Health and Kinesiology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States; Beckman Institute of Advanced Science and Technology, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.
Hannah D HolscherDivision of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States; Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States. Electronic address: hholsche@illinois.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDietary fiber may support cognition through gastrointestinal-microbiota mechanisms, but clinical evidence is limited.

objectivesWe aimed to determine whether soluble corn fiber (SCF) improved cognition and altered fecal microbiota and fermentation end products in adults.

methodsIn a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial, 42 healthy adults (45-75 y) consumed SCF (18 g/d) or a maltodextrin placebo control (CON: 22 g/d) for 4 wk, separated by a washout. Cognitive outcomes included executive function with event-related potentials, relational memory, neuropsychological performance, and mood. Secondary outcomes included fecal microbiota, metabolomics, and gastrointestinal tolerance. Tertiary analyses related microbial and metabolite changes to cognitive improvements using correlation, mediation, and moderation models, and explored SCF fermentation pathways with 16S-predicted functional profiling, shotgun metagenomics, and in vitro culturing.

resultsSCF improved reaction times (RT) during congruent (β = -9.8 ms, 95% confidence interval (CI): -18.4, -1.2, false discovery rate (FDR) P = 0.01) and incongruent (β = -14.2 ms, 95% CI: -22.8, -5.6, FDR P = 0.003) flanker trials and increased Parabacteroides (∼4-fold, β = 1.44 log, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.88, FDR P < 0.001). At the SCF endpoint, congruent RT tended to be inversely associated with fecal acetate (ρ = -0.33) and propionate (ρ = -0.36), whereas Parabacteroides was marginally positively associated with acetate (ρ = 0.34) (all FDR P < 0.1). Moderation analyses indicated that SCF-RT relation varied by Parabacteroides magnitude change. At endpoint, SCF increased the predicted functional potential of carbohydrate-related KEGG Orthologs and pathways (FDR P < 0.05). In vitro culturing confirmed Parabacteroides distasonis ferments SCF.

conclusionsSCF consumption improved attentional inhibition, altered the gut microbiota, and selectively enriched Parabacteroides. Although mediation analyses did not support a direct microbiota-to-cognition pathway, moderation analyses suggested that SCF-related cognitive effects may depend in part on Parabacteroides abundance. Collectively, these findings suggest that certain cognitive benefits of SCF consumption may be partly underpinned by the gut microbiota. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT05066425 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05066425).

Indexed as

Dietary FiberExecutive FunctionGastrointestinal MicrobiomeZea maysAgedCognitionCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFecesFemaleFermentationHumansMaleMiddle AgedDietary Fibercognitiondietary fibergut-brainParabacteroidesreaction time

Identifiers

PMID41825740
PMCPMC13197951

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.