ArticleClinical neuroradiology2026
Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2b Versus TICI 3 Reperfusion in Stroke Patients with Mild Symptoms.
Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe treatment effect of mechanical thrombectomy in patients with mild stroke symptoms and large vessel occlusion remains unclear. Furthermore, it is uncertain whether achieving complete reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [mTICI] 3) offers additional clinical benefit compared to incomplete reperfusion (mTICI 2b) in patients with mild stroke.
methodsIn this retrospective, multicenter analysis, all patients enrolled in the German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Treatment between 2015 and 2023 (n = 18,069) were evaluated. The study included patients with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of < 6 and anterior circulation large vessel occlusion. Clinical outcomes were compared between mTICI 2b and mTICI 3. The primary endpoint was excellent functional outcome at 90 days, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1.
resultsOf the 747 included patients, 37% achieved mTICI 2b and 63% mTICI 3. An excellent functional outcome was observed at similar rates in both groups (mTICI 2b: 59% vs. mTICI 3: 60%; P = 0.83; adjusted OR: 0.96 [95% CI: 0.66-1.40]; P = 0.84). The rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (4% vs. 3%; P = 0.36) and 90-day mortality (10% vs. 7%; P = 0.26; adjusted OR: 0.80 [95% CI: 0.42-1.50]; P = 0.49) were also comparable between the two groups.
conclusionAmong thrombectomy patients with mild stroke, complete reperfusion was not associated with better functional outcomes than incomplete reperfusion. These findings suggest that mTICI 2b may be an acceptable final angiographic result and raise questions about the risk-benefit ratio of additional retrieval maneuvers aimed at achieving mTICI 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41826435What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.