Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41826469›Full record

ReviewBritish dental journal2026

Management of deep caries.

Alice R Hamilton, David Ricketts

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alice R HamiltonDundee Dental Hospital and Research School, University of Dundee, United Kingdom. AHamilton005@dundee.ac.uk.
David RickettsDundee Dental Hospital and Research School, University of Dundee, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep dentinal caries, despite being preventable, is an ongoing widespread global issue. This review addresses deep carious lesions from aetiology through to management, and onto barriers in management implementation and ongoing research. Understanding the aetiology of dentinal caries and the histopathology of both carious lesions and the pulp-dentine complex reactions are crucial for providing the best clinical management, swinging the balance in favour of pulpal vitality. How caries removal techniques and terminology have changed over the past 100 years will also be explored together with current international guidelines and position statements on the management of deep carious lesions. However, despite this published guidance in support of more minimally invasive selective caries removal techniques, informed by decades of research, there remains a division among dental professionals globally on which technique should be routinely carried out for deep carious lesions. This paper briefly sets out some of the challenges associated with changing dental professionals' behaviour to align with implementation of the best available evidence, and how ongoing studies comparing the clinical and cost effectiveness of deep caries removal techniques and the environment for implementation are being led to strengthen the evidence base.

Indexed as

Dental CariesHumans

Identifiers

PMID41826469
PMCPMC12987717

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.