ReviewJournal of immigrant and minority health2026
The Participation of Muslim Migrant Women in Gynaecological Cancer Screening Programs Within Non-Muslim Communities: A Scoping Review.
Review in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gynaecological cancer screening is a crucial preventive measure for women. Muslim migrant women exhibit lower rates of participation in such screenings due to various factors, including language barriers, cultural differences and religious beliefs. Understanding their beliefs is vital to enhancing their participation in such screening. This study aims to explore the challenges faced by Muslim migrant women in engagement in gynaecological cancer screening programs. A Scoping Review methodology was adopted identifying Arabic and English relevant articles published since year 2000 onwards. Eight studies were included. Four primary themes were identified including: Muslim women’s engagement in screening, determinants influencing participation decisions, the influence of religious convictions, and the landscape of healthcare services in the host country. Although this review sought to examine barriers related to screening for all gynaecological cancers, the current evidence base remains heavily skewed toward cervical cancer. Despite the limited number of studies identified, the existing literature provides a comprehensive and insightful overview of the multifaceted and interrelated barriers in this field, offering a strong foundation for future research and the development of targeted pilot interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41826718What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.